An upcoming movie featuring an entirely AI-generated version of Val Kilmer has both fans and AI doomers furious.
Usually, when a new film is announced starring an actor who has died, it's a bittersweet celebration of their final role. In the case of As Deep As the Grave, Kilmer didn't film a single scene for the movie.
Instead, filmmakers used AI to create something that looks and sounds like him, pulling from previous recordings made throughout his life.
What is the AI Val Kilmer movie?
According to Variety, the movie itself is about "the true story of Southwestern archaeologists Ann and Earl Morris, chronicling their excavations in Canyon de Chelly, Arizona, in their effort to trace the history of the Navajo people." It was written and directed by Coerte Voorhees and stars Tom Felton, Abigail Lawrie, Abigail Breslin, and Wes Studi.
Kilmer was originally cast in the film, but even years before he died, health issues prevented him from taking part. His role was cut, but after a long, troubled production, Voorhees said the low-budget film had to come up with "innovative ways" to restore what he describes as the "major missing element" of the film.
So, with the help of Kilmer's estate and the blessing of his family, the film turned to AI.
"His family kept saying how important they thought the movie was and that Val really wanted to be a part of this," Voorhees told Variety. "He really thought it was [an] important story that he wanted his name on. It was that support that gave me the confidence to say, 'Okay, let’s do this.' Despite the fact some people might call it controversial, this is what Val wanted."
Controversial use of AI
Generative AI is controversial across the board for so many reasons. The potential for misuse, the harm to the environment, the way it stunts creativity and learning, copyright infringement, taking human jobs... the list goes on and on.
The idea of using it to impersonate a real person who has died adds a whole new level of ethical questions into the mix, regardless of what Kilmer's estate has approved. It feels especially egregious when Hollywood creatives have struggled with getting studios to promise protections against generative AI, only to have an indie film roll out and claim that using a generation of a very famous dead actor was somehow the only way they could finish their film.
The announcement certainly sparked plenty of debate, with many frustrated people on social media expressing their distaste for the decision and the framing of it.
The moment we start normalising this instead of chasing it away with torches and pitchforks is the moment we lose art as we know it. https://t.co/ORSfPbjqzr
— The Sietch of Sci-Fi | (@TSoS_) March 18, 2026
Yes I’m sure Val Kilmer would be so honored to be the forebearer of destruction of his art form. This is gross and everyone knows it. https://t.co/Wwf794uVg5
— Fiona Dourif (@fionadourif) March 19, 2026
After Philip Seymour Hoffman died, the director of the Hunger Games still had 2 scenes of dialogue for his character
— PoIiMath (@politicalmath) March 18, 2026
They played with the idea of doing a CGI version but rejected it because they felt that PSH always brought something unique and unexpected to every performance &… https://t.co/sVIejxyq8A
“Resurrected via AI” is such a dystopian sentence. https://t.co/mYXyHZe6Id pic.twitter.com/IK80gNJeXD
— Tolkien World (@TolkienWorldG) March 18, 2026
I know his daughter signed off but the choice to put his face on AI so entirely misses the point. "He was the actor I wanted to play this role," the director said. But the POINT of an actor playing a role is the CHOICES they'd make. Val can make none. https://t.co/W3z3NFGz3n
— AB (@AlannaBennett) March 18, 2026
never understood why getting a family member’s blessing is treated as the ethical end point for these ai people.
— george (@georgiem2000) March 18, 2026
like your family can be crass and profit motivated too. some people don’t have a public persona to sell out so they sell out their families’ instead. gross! https://t.co/xrHRt6vfyU
make no mistake, this is a cynical act of cost-cutting and viral marketing that we cannot let ourselves accept. let the dead rest. https://t.co/fAbos43Z2J
— emma (@msmegalodon) March 19, 2026
Can we please stop using AI and CGI to bring people back who have passed. It’s disrespectful to them and isn’t even remotely meaningful to the audience because it’s not real. It’s a cheap mimic of a human being and a computer is never going to be able to replicate the talent of… https://t.co/D4Pvj73CTR
— ?? ♡ (@emkenobi) March 18, 2026
i do always think about this quote from james cameron when things like this happen https://t.co/37bCpTi3CE pic.twitter.com/sfpcc2AYCW
— Elvira ??? (@gotosleepelvira) March 18, 2026
And also, give the F'ing jobs to the LIVING. https://t.co/pyUUFWtufO
— Kristen Schaal (@kristenschaaled) March 19, 2026
Without the hook of "resurrecting" a beloved actor via AI, it seems unlikely anyone would know what As Deep as the Grave is. The film has yet to be picked up for distribution, though one would imagine the filmmakers are hoping this press push changes that.
But will morbid curiosity and tech bro enthusiasm for all things AI translate to this PR gamble paying off? Or will audiences instead put their money and attention towards films created by and starring humans? Time will tell, but either way, Kilmer's work as an actor is done, no matter how this generative AI likeness is framed.
The internet is chaotic—but we’ll break it down for you in one daily email. Sign up for the Daily Dot’s newsletter here.






